France Closed Out Belgium with a Master Class in Wasting Time

7/10/2018

Part I: France v Belgium - Part II: Time-Wasting Report Card

France defeated Belgium 1-0 in the first World Cup semifinal on Tuesday, withstanding a few late pushes from The Red Devils with the help of two non-calls outside the box – and a master class in wasting time.

I reviewed the final 26 minutes of the match (70:00 through stoppage time) – during which France's time-wasting seemed to be most pronounced – and tracked starts and stoppages, their causes, and which team controlled each restart. Those final 26 minutes featured only 11 minutes and 52 seconds of action.

You can see the details below. Keep in mind that FIFA considers certain stoppages like throw-ins and goal kicks to be "entirely natural," noting that a time allowance should be made only when delays are excessive. But at what point does "natural" for a goal kick or throw-in end and "unnatural" begin? FIFA separately instructs that injuries, substitutions, time-wasting, and celebrations should be factored into stoppage time.

French Goal Kicks (4) = 2 minutes and 12 seconds (71' on)
French Throw-Ins (3) = 1 minute and 1 second (71' on)

France took four goal kicks during the final 26 minutes and shaved 30 seconds, 30 seconds, 45 seconds, and 27 seconds off the clock. (The third coincided with a French substitution). Their three late-match throw-ins burned 23 seconds, 15 seconds, and 23 seconds. Altogether, 3 minutes and 13 seconds of the final 26 minutes were paused for goal kicks and throw-ins – about one-eighth of the game's home stretch.

French Injuries (3) = 4 minutes and 8 seconds (71' on)

Injuries to France's Samuel Umtiti in the 73rd minute and Blaise Matuidi in the 81st and 85th minutes cost the match 50 seconds, 125 seconds, and 73 seconds, respectively – good for 4 minutes and 8 seconds in all. (Belgium's Eden Hazard was also hurt in the 81st minute, but he was back on his feet in 48 seconds..)

When the whistle blew after Matuidi and Hazard's collision, the clock read 80:57. After play resumed, France milked a 45-second goal kick and substitute, Matuidi went down again, Belgium set up a long free kick, and France took another goal kick. The clock read 88:30. It was damn near the 90th minute, Over seven-and-a-half minutes had melted off the game clock. France and Belgium played for two of them.

French Free Kicks (5) = 3 minutes and 39 seconds (71' on)
Mbappé's Yellow = 31 seconds (92')
France's Corner = 37 seconds (96')

Les Bleus successfully squandered another 3 minutes and 39 seconds after five Belgian fouls (one of which led to a Belgian substitution); Kylian Mbappé took 31 seconds for his yellow-card inducing ball-bobbling antics in the 92nd minute; and France wasted 37 seconds before their 96th-minute corner. Six minutes of stoppage time were added. France and Belgium played for about two-and-a-half of them.

From the 71st minute on (26 minutes and 13 seconds of match time), France and Belgium were paused or delayed for 14 minutes and 21 seconds – 55% of what should have been the most exciting part of the semifinal. France was primarily responsible for 12 minutes and 8 seconds (85%) of that wasted time.

I'm not saying all of that time should have been added back (though FiveThirtyEight found that World Cup stoppage time has been about half as long as it should be, even when you allow for the "natural" slippage associated with throw-ins and goal kicks). I don't even think you can really blame France. The rules are the rules, after all. Everybody wastes time when they're winning. France just did it extremely well today.

But it does kinda feel like FIFA needs to do something more. Howbout if you're down for one or two minutes you have to be substituted? Wouldn't that make these dudes get up? Actual increased stoppage time? Quicker yellows for modest delays? A red for something overt? I'm an American who only obsessively watches every four years, so I hold little authority. But I would love to hear your thoughts ; )

Times presented represent best estimates based on analysis of Fox Sports TV coverage. Three moments are asterisked because the camera cut away from the field. Other reasonable analyses might arrive at slightly different time estimates. Data was compiled and analyzed by ELDORADO. All charts and graphs herein were created by ELDORADO.

4 Comments

franck

7/12/2018 01:47:47 pm

to have some perspective, it would be interesting to:
- have the same figures for the rest of the game.
- compare with other games to make sure the "master class" award is deserved.
i found some statistics showing that effective playing time on a premier league football game is around 55-56 minutes, i.e.62%.
these 12 minutes out of 26 represent 46%.
presented that way (12 out of 26), one has a tendency to think that 14 minutes have been wasted but the 12 lost minutes should be compared to a typical effective playing time of 62% of these 26min = 16min. in this case, only a 4 min difference...

ELDORADO

7/14/2018 09:44:17 am

Hi Franck, thank you for your comments!

I definitely wanted to compare this with other matches (in the World Cup knockout stage and beyond), but unfortunately it's a very manual process. Since posting this article, I have written a second part that compares this match with the other knockout round matches in this World Cup that had a one-goal margin for all or nearly all of the 71st minute through stoppage time.

You can find that here: https://www.eldo.co/analysis/world-cup-knockout-stage-time-wasting-report-card-france-did-it-best-worst-followed-by-brazil

France wasted time best among the leading sides in those matches, milking 46% of the match from the 71st minute. Brazil (v. Mexico) was not far behind. The others were not nearly as bad. I would give France and Brazil both the "master class" designation within this six-match sample, though of course it would be great to have even broader context into all top-level matches, or all of World Cup history to really know for sure!

I see your point about the four-minute difference relative to baseline (for the final 26 minutes of the match), but my view is that losing an extra four minutes in a 26-minute span is actually quite a lot ; )

If the opportunity ever presents itself, I'd also love to compare this with matches that were tied, matches with a two-goal lead, and matches with a three-goal lead or more. The tied matches seem like they could form a baseline, but even then, I suspect that the "inferior" side will waste some time in order to push for extra time or a shootout. I think two-goal leads we would see less time wasted. And for blowouts, maybe even less time wasted, though at a certain point I wonder if the players start to "take their time" because the match is already settled, kind of creating some unintentional wasting of time.

It's all quite interesting! Here is another numbers-based article on the topic if you're interested: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/world-cup-stoppage-time-is-wildly-inaccurate/

Jaque

7/12/2018 07:07:38 pm

Bad stats, Goal kick, corner.... loool

Tintin

7/13/2018 06:36:04 am

Well, I didn't see it that way. To me the french didn't have to play the ball as if they were loosing the game. The belgian team however had to... That's explain why a goal kick takes only 8s for Belgium and 30s for France... 30s being normal to me.
Fact is the Belgium team was not able to keep the ball and thus gave to the french the control of the clock.
I saw the game twice and what is obvious is the Belgium team wasn't closed to score, I don't think your point is relevant, the belgians had 90 minutes to score, they didn't. Belgium lacks strategy, attacking is not enough.

About the ref now. You say there were 2 non-calls, I see just one actually. What you have to keep in mind is the difference between a ref from SA and one from Europe. In SA the ref are used to see very physical football with huge contact, it explains why the ref didn't consider Giroud made a foul, he touched the ball. In Europe that kind of physical football is not allowed. But if the ref was from Europe Hazard would have had that free-kick but some of his partner would have had yellow and maybe 1 red card (for fouls made during counter attacks, violence, tackle from the back, too much physical engagement).
What I saw is a french team that was able to frustrate his opponent with strategy.
BTW I'm from Belgium myself, so it's hard to swallow that game but that's the way it is...

France Closed Out Belgium with a Master Class in Wasting Time

Leave a Reply.

Contact

ELDORADO